Oshoma Warns Judge May Foreclose Defense in Judgment

Public interest lawyer Liborous Oshoma has issued a critical warning regarding the ongoing trial of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader Nnamdi Kanu. He stated that the court could foreclose the defense and move directly to judgment if Kanu’s legal team appears unprepared or causes further delays.

Oshoma shared this perspective during a TVC News interview, analyzing the potential consequences of Kanu’s decision to summon high-profile witnesses. The IPOB leader’s reported witness list includes serving governors, a former Attorney General, and past heads of national security agencies.

Challenges in Compelling High-Profile Witnesses

The legal expert explained that while Nigerian courts possess the authority to compel witness attendance, enforcing this against individuals with constitutional immunity presents significant hurdles. He specifically noted that serving governors enjoy immunity from legal proceedings under the current constitution, making their compelled testimony practically unfeasible.

Oshoma further questioned the strategic value of these witness summonses, observing they don’t appear tied to presenting documentary evidence. This raises doubts about their actual purpose and potential impact on the case. Additionally, individuals connected to sensitive national security matters might refuse to testify publicly, citing official confidentiality protocols.

As detailed in the complete version, there are several key factors to consider.

Readiness for Defense Questioned

Regarding trial preparedness, Oshoma expressed skepticism about whether Kanu’s legal team is truly ready to commence their defense. He emphasized that continued delays could frustrate the judicial process, prompting the court to exercise its powers to conclude proceedings.

“Permit me to say this,” Oshoma stated during the interview. “I doubt if Kanu is really ready to open a defense in the matter. If care is not taken, the judge might just go ahead to foreclose his defense and deliver judgment.”

This caution comes amid intense legal scrutiny surrounding Kanu’s prolonged trial, which continues to attract both domestic and international attention. Legal analysts consistently describe the case as one of Nigeria’s most politically sensitive prosecutions, touching on fundamental issues of national unity and constitutional rights. The outcome could set important precedents for handling similar cases involving separatist movements and their leaders.