Moment US Troops And Nigerian Army Got To Boko Haram Camp, They Saw Boko Haram Wearing Gas Masks-Ogebe

United States-based attorney Emmanuel Ogebe has revealed startling details about security cooperation challenges between American and Nigerian military forces. The legal practitioner identified a specific incident that allegedly created lasting distrust between both nations’ armed services.

During a television interview with Channels TV, Ogebe described a critical intelligence breach during efforts to rescue kidnapped Chibok schoolgirls. The lawyer explained that American forces have historically hesitated to conduct joint combat operations with Nigerian counterparts due to fundamental trust issues.

Ogebe recounted a planned rescue operation developed during President Barack Obama’s administration. United States officials reportedly devised a strategy to peacefully extract the abducted girls without armed confrontation through specialized tactical approaches.

The proposed operation involved using gas to incapacitate everyone at the terrorist camp location. This method would theoretically allow security forces to rescue the captives without risking casualties from potential firefights with insurgent elements…..See More

According to the legal advocate’s account, American and Nigerian forces proceeded to the identified terrorist location following operational planning. Upon arrival, they encountered an unexpected and revealing situation at the camp.

As detailed in the complete version, there are several key factors to consider.

The attorney claimed that Boko Haram fighters were prepared with gas masks when joint forces reached their position. This preparation suggested prior knowledge of the specific tactical approach planned by American military planners.

Ogebe interpreted this development as clear evidence of operational intelligence leakage to terrorist elements. He suggested this incident fundamentally damaged American confidence in Nigerian military security protocols and information management.

The lawyer connected this historical incident to current United States reluctance regarding direct military collaboration. He indicated that trust deficits continue influencing American decisions about boots-on-ground cooperation in counterinsurgency operations.

Ogebe also addressed government arguments about universal victimization across religious lines during terrorist violence. He characterized such acknowledgments as admissions of state failure rather than valid defensive arguments.

The legal expert suggested that widespread violence affecting multiple religious communities actually strengthens cases for international intervention. According to his interpretation, systemic security failures create legitimate grounds for external involvement in domestic security matters.

The attorney emphasized that rebuilding international confidence requires demonstrated commitment from Nigerian military institutions. He argued that substantive security improvements must replace explanations about violence distribution patterns.

Olegbe’s comments emerge amid ongoing discussions about Nigeria-United States security cooperation. Recent diplomatic tensions have highlighted complex relationships between both nations’ military establishments.

The described incident represents one perspective in broader conversations about counterterrorism collaboration. Verification of specific operational details remains challenging given the sensitive nature of military intelligence matters.

As security challenges persist in northeastern Nigeria, international cooperation continues evolving. Trust-building measures may prove crucial for effective future collaboration against insurgent threats in the region……See More